Unstoppable (Shagmatic Fucking Machine) Machine Fully Tested, It Is Amazing

In celebration of my Hubbie’s 64th birthday, we gave the Unstoppable Shagmatic Fucking Machine a test on both of us. Very shortly it stopped working. We were very disappointed. I shut it off and waited until all lights on the Gecko were out and then another 30 seconds. Some how the Gecko had registered a fault and this needed to be cleared. Not a single hiccup after this and we really tested the machine hard. We were no longer disappointed 🙂

We were both moaning and exclaiming enthusiastically. This machine follows anything you tell it to do. Extremely high speed vibration (approximately 100 strokes per second) is reproduced perfectly. With the direct cable drive, there is no slipping and the huge motor does not miss steps at all. I might actually lower the current limit as a safety feature especially since we were using a metal dildo.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Unstoppable (Shagmatic Fucking Machine) Machine Fully Tested, It Is Amazing

  1. Penguinn says:

    Mr. Matic insisted I reply to this post.
    I am completely at a loss to describe the experience. I have no point of reference because there is such a vast gap between what I have previously experienced (human dick) and something delivering over 100 strokes/min, but still orchestrated by another human.
    I also very much enjoy running the machine for the spousal unit. He has put an inestimable amount of work into creating these machines and I am pleased that I can show him what he has made possible.
    He seems quite enthusiastic.

  2. Mike says:

    Too bad there aren’t any pics of it in action. Or better yet, video. ; )

    • shagmatic says:

      don’t have any attractive models available. even if i did, i don’t think that a video could show what it actually feels like to be fucked by a machine that is under the control of a human and that responds to every minute detail of their control. the high speed vibration i referred to is not machine generated but is the exact duplication of the input provided by the person controlling the machine. this allows for an amazing variety of stimulation, a truly individual and unique experience. not even sure if a typical video camera could capture the nuances. imagine a complex piece of music being interpreted by the person controlling the machine and applying this to your orifice of choice. when i was doing the controlling, i was thinking of a specific piece of classical music. the music we had on at the time was too far away and soft to follow, i just used my imagination. i have used louder music as a source of rhythm at other times. i like to play my LX piano with heavy classical solo pieces and follow them with the joystick.

  3. ActionPackedSF says:

    Congrats on your achievement!! Enjoy the amazing sensations your new creation delivers. Having built a machine of my own a year ago, just your standard high muscle gear motor & flywheel variety, I can tell you that the waves of pleasure are made wholely more fulfilling having endured the Trial of One Thousand Paper Cuts to bring your machine into the world.

    I’ve been watching your project progress for about a year. Watching your documentaries mature, I’m eagerly anticipating a little more detail on the main controller build Manual. You’ve done so much already. I feel the cad asking at all. Take your time. And go for another ride.

    I do want to pass along this though: get yourself some of Doc Hohnson’s dual density toys to ride on your machine. Fort Troff sells them as their Real Deal line. the Doc Johnson HUNG u3r (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00JURRU8E/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_ZtCMzbC1ZY85B) think BAM with a velvety lifelike silicone skin, is an absolute dream when driven by machine.

    Cheers!

    • shagmatic says:

      what sort of detail do no need?

      • ActionPackedSF says:

        A couple of things would be good. You mention one in the Doc: a schematic.

        The other is pretty minor but important. I didn’t see the micro controller (Digelent?) mentioned in the parts list. (D’oh!)

        Cheers!

        • ActionPackedSF says:

          I believe the Teensy 3.1 is missing, too.

          After further digestion, I agree. A schematic isn’t necessary. Everything’s in the sheets and the code.

          Thanks!!

          • shagmatic says:

            i do not have a schematic but there is a pinout chart on the resource page that should be enough. if someone is good at drawing schematics, i would work with them to make one. it really is just a mater of connecting ins and outs to the right pins and the chart pretty much explains that.

            the 3.1 works just the same as the 3.2, very minor differences. also the 3.5 and 3.6 work great (i use a 3.5 for the audio responding machine) but you have to be careful with the 3.6 because it is not 5 volt input tolerant so the joystick encoder must be chosen that will work on 3.3 volts. on the shag board i have a jumper for choosing encoder supply voltage to protect a 3.3 volt only micro.

            the reference to a Digelent is old. I have not used one of these for years. The teensies are smaller, cheaper and have more libraries they work with. maybe Digilent got it together since i used them but they were really slow in providing useful libraries and functions.

  4. ActionPackedSF says:

    Typo: Doc Johnson, not Hohnson.

    Also, I saw in your pics a chocolate HUNG already in service! You know there’s a bigger model right? Fort Troff sells it as their Monster 10.0. Be warned tho: they say it’s 10″ around but it’s more like 9.25″. Still feels might great tho.

    Cheers!

  5. ActionPackedSF says:

    I’ve been catching up in the docs over the past hour and, again, I agree. It’s all there in the docs and this blog. Just saw the musically driven shagalicious machine movie. Amazing! What a fun morning this has been!

    Cheers!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *